ROSE FOR KIDS: AN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GIRLS' INTEREST IN STEAM
Main Article Content
Abstract
Gender inequality in STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math) fields results from sociocultural factors, gender stereotypes, and the lack of female role models, rather than from women's lower cognitive aptitude compared to men. In this context, recent studies have applied the ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education) questionnaire to collect data on adolescents' interests, attitudes, and perceptions regarding science and technology. However, the ROSE questionnaire has limitations, including excessive length, a focus on adolescents, the use of technical and/or metaphorical language, and grounding in developed-country contexts. In light of this, this study proposes an instrument to assess elementary school girls' interest in STEM fields within disadvantaged socioeconomic contexts. To this end, the research was applied in nature, with exploratory objectives and a mixed-methods approach, employing a literature review, documentary research, a case study, and statistical analysis. The results obtained were: (1) the specification of an instrument called ROSE for Kids, which corresponds to an adaptation designed to address the gaps identified in the original questionnaire; and (2) a statistical analysis of the ROSE for Kids application with 49 elementary school girls from 5 public schools in Northeastern Brazil, as a case study. The findings indicated that the participants easily understood the items and provided responses, which suggests a level of interest and out-of-school experience, as well as favorable motivation toward future careers in STEM fields.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anthropic. (2025). Claude Opus 4.5. https://claude.ai
Araújo, I. M., Andrade, V. C., & Clifford, A. A. (2024). O interesse de estudantes secundaristas pela ciência: Uma aplicação do Projeto ROSE na capital brasileira. Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo, 16(13), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.55905/cuadv16n13-126
Biroli, F. (2018). Gênero e desigualdades: Limites da democracia no Brasil. Boitempo.
Giddens, A. (2002). Modernidade e identidade (P. Dentzien, Trad.). Jorge Zahar. (Obra original publicada em 1991).
Gil, A. C. (2002). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. Atlas.
Guenaga Gómez, M., & Fernández Álvarez, L. (2020). Inspira STEAM: Breaking the confidence gap with female roles. Investigaciones Feministas, 11(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.65836
Lykkegaard, E., & Ulriksen, L. (2019). In and out of the STEM pipeline – a longitudinal study of a misleading metaphor. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1600-1625. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1622054
Master, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Cheryan, S. (2021). Gender stereotypes about interests start early and cause gender disparities in computer science and engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(48), e2100030118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100030118
Monteiro, S. (2025, agosto 13). Mais da metade dos lares brasileiros é chefiada por mulheres, que ganham 30% a menos que os homens, aponta Janaína Feijó. Blog da Conjuntura Econômica, FGV IBRE. https://ibre.fgv.br/blog-da-conjuntura-economica/artigos/mais-da-metade-dos-lares-brasileiros-e-chefiada-por-mulheres
Nexus – Pesquisa e Inteligência de Dados. (2025, fevereiro 11). Taxa de conclusão feminina em cursos de ciências caiu quase 50%. https://www.nexus.fsb.com.br/estudos-divulgados/conclusao-feminina-em-cursos-de-ciencias-caiu-quase-50-desde-a-pandemia/
Petrucci, D., González, D., Benitez, M., & Hermida, M. J. (2024). Los intereses de jóvenes del conurbano bonaerense en cuestiones de ciencia y tecnología. Revista de Enseñanza de la Física, 36(extra), 287-296. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revistaEF/article/view/47266/47281
Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE: Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education) – A comparative study of students' views of science and science education. University of Oslo, Department of Teacher Education and School Development.
Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053-1075. https://doi.org/10.2307/1864376
Sharma, H. (2022). How short or long should be a questionnaire for any research? Researchers dilemma in deciding the appropriate questionnaire length. Saudi Journal of Anesthesia, 16(1), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_163_21
Tassini, S. C. V., Adami, L. N. G., Simionato, N. M., & Andersen, M. L. (2022). Descobrindo nossas cientistas: Desafios da carreira. Revista Brasileira de Pós-graduação, 18(especial), 1-29.
Tolentino-Neto, L. C. B. (2008). Os interesses e posturas de jovens alunos frente às ciências: Resultados do Projeto ROSE aplicado no Brasil [Tese de doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo]. Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP. https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/48/48134/tde-16062008-155323/pt-br.php
UN Women. (2025). Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The gender snapshot 2025. United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/gender-snapshot/2025/