Persistence of Gender Stereotypes in Students’ Representations of Scientists: Evidence from Portuguese Lower Secondary Education

Main Article Content

Ana Maia Fernandes
Sofia Cardim

Abstract

Gender stereotypes related to science and scientists continue to shape students’ perceptions from an early age, contributing to persistent gender inequalities in STEM fields. This exploratory study examines how lower secondary school students in Portugal portray scientists, with a particular focus on gendered patterns. Conducted during the first week of the 2024/2025 school year, the study involved 28 eighth-grade students. It employed the Draw-A-Scientist Test Checklist (DAST-C), using a quantitative approach complemented by interpretative qualitative elements. As this is an exploratory study, it does not aim to draw generalisable conclusions, but rather to identify indicative patterns and generate information for future research. Quantitative and qualitative analyses reveal a strong persistence of stereotypical representations, particularly masculine traits such as lab coats, glasses, and facial hair. At the same time, female scientists remain markedly underrepresented and are depicted exclusively by female students. These findings highlight the continued influence of gendered imaginaries during early adolescence and underline the role of schools as critical spaces for challenging stereotypes and promoting more inclusive representations of science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fernandes, A. M., & Cardim, S. (2026). Persistence of Gender Stereotypes in Students’ Representations of Scientists:: Evidence from Portuguese Lower Secondary Education. EduSer, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.34620/eduser.v18i1.407
Section
Articles

References

Allen, M. (2018). Gender gap in physics among highest in science. Physics World, 31(5), 10. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/31/5/16

Barromi-Perlman, E., Dekel, T., & Barchana-Lorand, D. (2021). Gender and visual literacy: Towards gender-sensitive readings. Journal of Visual Literacy, 40(3-4), 145-148.

Bozzato, P., Fabris, M. A., & Longobardi, C. (2021). Gender, stereotypes and grade level in the draw-a-scientist test in Italian schoolchildren. International Journal of Science Education, 43(16), 2640–2662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1982062

Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213

European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2024). Addressing the gender gap in STEM education across educational levels: Analytical report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/260477

Eurostat. (2024). Female tertiary education graduates in STEM education fields [tps00217]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

Ferguson, S. L., & Lezotte, S. M. (2020). Exploring the state of science stereotypes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the draw-a-scientist checklist. School Science and Mathematics, 120(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12382

Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw-a-Scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15762.x

Filipova, P. (2017). Women (and) scientists: Modern sexism in The Big Bang Theory. Oceánide, 9(2). http://oceanide.netne.net/articulos/art9-2.pdf

Gormally, C., & Inghram, R. (2021). Goggles and white lab coats: Students’ perspectives on scientists and the continued need to challenge stereotypes. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(1), ar10. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2199

Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363

Kataeva, Z., Durrani, N., Izekenova, Z., & Roshka, V. (2024). Thirty years of gender mainstreaming: Evolution, development, and future research agenda through a bibliometric approach. Women’s Studies International Forum, 107, 103010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.103010

Martins, I., Baptista, M., & Reis, P. (2023). Students’ images of STEM professionals: A study in the Portuguese context. Education 3–13, 51(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1955945

Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender–science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of five decades of U.S. draw-a-scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039

Mitchell, M., & McKinnon, M. (2019). “Human” or “objective” faces of science? Gender stereotypes and the representation of scientists in the media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518796794

Schinske, J. N., Perkins, H., Snyder, A., & Wyer, M. (2015). Scientist spotlight homework assignments shift students' stereotypes of scientists and enhance science identity in a diverse introductory science class. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar47. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0002

Starr, C. R. (2018). “I’m not a science nerd!” STEM stereotypes, identity, and motivation among undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318791912

Tintori, A., & Palomba, R. (Eds.). (2017). Turn on the light on science. Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bba

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. (2021). UNESCO Science Report 2021: The Race Against Time for Smarter Development. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210058575

World Economic Forum. (2023). Global gender gap report 2023. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2023

Wyer, M., Schneider, J., Nassar-McMillan, S., & Oliver-Hoyo, M. (2010). Capturing stereotypes: Developing a scale to explore U.S. college students’ images of science and scientists. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 2(3). https://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/78